Two men convicted of murdering Malcolm X in 1965 to have convictions thrown out tomorrow
Two men convicted of murdering civil rights leader Malcolm X in 1965 will have their convictions thrown out tomorrow – validating long-held doubts about who REALLY killed him
Muhammad Aziz, 83, and the late Khalil Islam, spent decades in prison for the crime, after being found guilty for the killing in 1966The decision follows a 22-month investigation into the mishandling of proceedings following the 1965 assassination of the civil rights leader X was gunned down as he began a speech in Harlem’s Audubon Ballroom on Harlem’s Audubon Ballroom on February 21, 1965The two men were then known as Norman 3X Butler and Thomas 15X JohnsonAziz was released in 1985 – Islam was released two years later, and died in 2009
<!–
<!–
<!–<!–
<!–
(function (src, d, tag){
var s = d.createElement(tag), prev = d.getElementsByTagName(tag)[0];
s.src = src;
prev.parentNode.insertBefore(s, prev);
}(“https://www.dailymail.co.uk/static/gunther/1.17.0/async_bundle–.js”, document, “script”));
<!–
DM.loadCSS(“https://www.dailymail.co.uk/static/gunther/gunther-2159/video_bundle–.css”);
<!–
The two men convicted of assassinating renowned civil rights leader Malcolm X in 1965 are expected to be exonerated on Thursday, their lawyers and the Manhattan district attorney said Wednesday.
Muhammad Aziz, 83, and the late Khalil Islam, who both spent decades in prison for the crime, were being exonerated after a nearly two-year investigation by their lawyers and the Manhattan district attorney’s office, a report by the New York Times revealed.
In an interview with the outlet, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. apologized on behalf of those who convicted the two Black Muslim men, and admitted that key missteps occurred during the 1966 trial.
‘This points to the truth that law enforcement over history has often failed to live up to its responsibilities,’ Vance Jr. said.
‘These men did not get the justice that they deserved.’
Muhammad Aziz, pictured at left being escorted by detectives after his arrest in New York in 1965, and alleged accomplice Khalil Islam, who died in 2009, will be exonerated for the assassination on Thursday, attorneys say
Malcolm X was gunned down as he began a speech in Harlem’s Audubon Ballroom on Harlem’s Audubon Ballroom on February 21, 1965
The decision to nix their convictions comes after a 22-month investigation into allegations that prosecutors, the FBI, and the New York Police Department withheld crucial evidence in the case that would have acquitted the pair – who both received life sentences for their alleged part in the killing, but were paroled in the 80s.
Both men maintained their innocence for the entirety of their incarcerations – which amounted to a combined 42 years – and long afterwards as well, with Islam attesting he had no role in the assassination at Harlem’s Audubon Ballroom in Washington Heights on February 21, 1965, until his dying day, and a now elderly Aziz still standing by that same sentiment.
What’s more, the third man arrested for the killing, Thomas Hagan, the only one of the three to confess to the crime, long insisted that Aziz and Islam were not guilty – first attesting to that sentiment when he took the stand during the 1966 trial to confess to his part in the killing.
Hagan, now 80, and once a member of the Nation of Islam along with the soon-to-be exonerated pair, told investigators Malcolm X was targeted because of his 1964 split with the leadership of the political organization, a movement for which he had once served as the lead spokesman – with Aziz and Islam playing no part in the conspiracy.
Hagan was freed from a prison in April of 2010 at the age of 69, serving 45 years of his life sentence.
The third man arrested for the killing, Thomas Hagan, now 80 and out of jail, was the only one of the three to confess to the crime, and long insisted that Aziz and Islam were not guilty – first attesting to that sentiment when he took the stand for a second time during the 1966 trial
A divisive figure during the civil rights movement in the 1960s, Malcom X was renowned for his fierce, repeated attempts to empower the African-American community, through firebrand speeches and strong statements urging black men and women across the globe to unite against what he called white oppression.
A minister and leading figure for the Nation of Islam during the first half of the decade, he was considered a great orator and a fierce advocate of black nationalism – but his decision to leave the Nation in 1964 jilted many who had previously rallied behind the impassioned activist.
With that said, the influential figure also had enemies on the other end of the racial and political spectrum, due to a long track record of contentious comments slamming the US government, religion, law enforcement, and white people in general.
Historians and legal experts have long raised questions concerning the convictions, with many citing that the three Black Muslim men had been hastily arrested and tried on tenuous evidence.
However, interest in the case skyrocketed earlier this year, in February, after the family of deceased former NYPD officer stationed in the Harlem ballroom during the assassination released a letter penned by the African-American cop, Ray Wood, in 2011, confessing that he, the NYPD, and the federal government arranged for Malcolm X not to be adequately protected during his speech.
He also confessed to helping frame Islam, in particular.
In an interview with the Times, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. apologized on behalf of those involved in convicting the two Black Muslim men and said key missteps occurred in the 1966 trial, leading to the pair being found guilty
The public’s fascination with the case’s questionable convictions was further compounded that same month when Netflix released of a six-part documentary chronicling the assassination, its buildup, and aftermath, titled, ‘Who Killed Malcolm X?’
Vance’s reopening of the case, however, started well before the surge of renewed interest in the 55-year-old initial investigation, nearly two years ago.
The Manhattan DA oversaw the lengthy probe alongside the Innocence Project – nonprofit legal organization that is committed to exonerating individuals who have been wrongly convicted – and civil rights lawyer David Shanies, with the team reportedly uncovering enough evidence to exonerate the two men.
According to Vance, the reinvestigation process managed to stand up an alibi given to police by Aziz after his 1965 arrest.
What’s more, the group’s findings reportedly also implicated other suspects aside from Aziz and Islam, and further revealed that prosecutors hid the fact that undercover police were discreetly stationed throughout the Harlem concert hall when Malcolm X was shot multiple times by three men, one toting a shotgun and the other two brandishing pistols, as the activist was starting to speak – bolstering Wood’s deathbed claim.
The civil rights activist, one of the most influential black men in the modern era, was shot at least 15 times in front of his pregnant wife and three of his daughters during the chaos – with a blast from the shotgun proving to be the fatal blow.
After the assassination, Hagan, then known by name bestowed upon him by The Nation of Islam, Mujahid Abdul Halim, was the first to be apprehended, taken down by cops in the ballroom after being shot in the thigh.
Aziz, then known as Norman 3X Butler, was cuffed five days later, and Islam, then known as Thomas 15X Johnson, five days after that.
Within a week, the three men, all members of the Nation, had been charged with first-degree murder.
At the subsequent trial in 1966, prosecutors labeled Islam, once Malcolm X’s personal chauffeur, as the gunman who fired the fatal shotgun blast.
Aziz and Hagan were said to have been the pair providing cover fire with the pistols.
Ten eyewitnesses said they had seen Islam or Aziz – with multiple fingering both.
However, the witness statements were found to contradict one another, and no physical evidence tied Aziz or Islam to the murder or the scene of the crime.
What’s more, both men provided air-tight alibis, which were attested by testimony from their spouses and friends.
And, as mentioned, Hagan repeatedly told investigators and jurists that the pair had nothing to do with the murder.
What’s more, one defense witness present at the ballroom during Malcolm X’s assassination, Ernest Greene, testified that he had seen the man with the shotgun, and offered the court a description vastly different from Islam, the one labeled by prosecutors to have used the high-powered weapon.
Greene described the shooter as dark-skinned, stocky, and sporting a ‘deep’ beard – a stark contrast from Islam, who was light-skinned, lean, and clean-shaven – sans a small moustache.
However, Greene’s description did match someone who knew the civil rights leader, and someone jurors were not made aware of during the case’s proceedings: William Bradley, a known enforcer for the Nation of Islam – a man that Hagan told police was part of the assassination plot.
Greene was less than six feet tall, had a hefty build and was dark-skinned.
A description of Bradley was in FBI files at the time of the case, and Mr. Halim even identified him as one of the assassins.
Previously a machine-gunner in the Marine Corps, Greene also boasted rich criminal history which included a charge for possessing an illegal weapon.
But, nonetheless, on March 11, 1966, all three defendants were found guilty and subsequently sentenced to life in prison.
Aziz was released on parole in 1985, while Islam was released two years later, in 1987.
He died in 2009.
In prison, both men changed their names and converted to a more mainstream, less radicalized form of Islam, with Islam deciding to reject the teachings of the Nation altogether.
Aziz, on the other hand, was able to obtain both a bachelor’s and master’s degree in religious studies while incarcerated, and worked as chief of security for a Harlem mosque upon his release.
He has since retired and currently lives in New York.
![]()

